Comments on: Adding support for Java 5 enums to Naked Objects – part 2 http://danhaywood.com/2010/02/28/adding-support-for-java-5-enums-to-naked-objects-part-2/ domain driven design, restful objects, apache isis, the naked objects pattern, agile and more Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:41:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: danhaywood http://danhaywood.com/2010/02/28/adding-support-for-java-5-enums-to-naked-objects-part-2/#comment-122 Sat, 03 Jul 2010 07:26:34 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=526#comment-122 It was my stupid mistake – thanks, no fixed.
By the way, I’ve committed these changes to the trunk; so if you pull down the NOF trunk (http://nakedobjects.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/nakedobjects/framework/trunk) you’ll see them there. If you want to build the NOF, it’s a matter of:
cd pom ; mvn clean install ; cd .. ; mvn clean install

]]> By: Alan X Franklin http://danhaywood.com/2010/02/28/adding-support-for-java-5-enums-to-naked-objects-part-2/#comment-121 Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:16:14 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=526#comment-121 Not sure if is just an entry creation typo, or blog framework error, but working through the code, I see two copies of PropertyChoicesFacetDerivedFromChoicesFacet and no code for ActionParameterChoicesFacetDerivedFromChoicesFacet.

Damm, I’m going to have to put my brain in gear and try to work it out…..

]]> By: Simplifying inheritance hierarchies using powertypes and Java 5 enums | Domain Driven Design using Naked Objects http://danhaywood.com/2010/02/28/adding-support-for-java-5-enums-to-naked-objects-part-2/#comment-120 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:45:20 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=526#comment-120 [...] Adding support for Java 5 enums to Naked Objects – part 2 » var dzone_url = [...]

]]> By: danhaywood http://danhaywood.com/2010/02/28/adding-support-for-java-5-enums-to-naked-objects-part-2/#comment-119 Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:53:14 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=526#comment-119 @Alexander,
This *is* the solution! Perhaps it isn’t clear from the post, but setting up those facet factories etc is a one-off, and will support any generic.

@Giorgio,
I wouldn’t call this a proof-of-concept, this is pretty much the code that will go into 4.1. I’ve posted it here early (a) for anyone who’s missing enums, and (b) to demonstrate how the NO programming model can be extended.

Cheers
Dan

]]> By: Giorgio Sironi http://danhaywood.com/2010/02/28/adding-support-for-java-5-enums-to-naked-objects-part-2/#comment-118 Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:10:46 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=526#comment-118 From what I understand this is a proof of concept, they will add support for enums in the 4.1 release.

]]> By: Alexander http://danhaywood.com/2010/02/28/adding-support-for-java-5-enums-to-naked-objects-part-2/#comment-117 Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:23:49 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=526#comment-117 I have to do all this just to have enum support? It isn’t the solution!

]]> By: Adding support for Java 5 enums to Naked Objects | Domain Driven Design using Naked Objects http://danhaywood.com/2010/02/28/adding-support-for-java-5-enums-to-naked-objects-part-2/#comment-116 Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:32:18 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=526#comment-116 [...] Adding support for Java 5 enums to Naked Objects – part 2    Simulated Enums – supporting choices » var dzone_url = [...]

]]>