Comments on: Naked Objects Programming: Property Business Rules http://danhaywood.com/2009/10/16/naked-objects-programming-property-business-rules/ domain driven design, restful objects, apache isis, the naked objects pattern, agile and more Thu, 17 May 2012 16:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Naked Objects Programming: Property Business Rules | Java™ Software Development Videos and Tutorials Directory http://danhaywood.com/2009/10/16/naked-objects-programming-property-business-rules/#comment-58 Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:44:45 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=329#comment-58 [...] http://danhaywood.com/2009/10/16/naked-objects-programming-property-business-rules/ [...]

]]> By: Naked Objects Programming: Property Business Rules | Software Development Videos http://danhaywood.com/2009/10/16/naked-objects-programming-property-business-rules/#comment-57 Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:44:28 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=329#comment-57 [...] http://danhaywood.com/2009/10/16/naked-objects-programming-property-business-rules/ [...]

]]> By: Nobalpath http://danhaywood.com/2009/10/16/naked-objects-programming-property-business-rules/#comment-56 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:56:00 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=329#comment-56 Nice article

]]> By: danhaywood http://danhaywood.com/2009/10/16/naked-objects-programming-property-business-rules/#comment-55 Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:34:12 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=329#comment-55 re: CATEGORIES: Yup, should have been static.

]]> By: Alexander http://danhaywood.com/2009/10/16/naked-objects-programming-property-business-rules/#comment-54 Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:16:08 +0000 http://danhaywood.com/?p=329#comment-54 Why did you make CATEGORIES instance constant instead of class constant?

Any Collection have method isEmpty() and I suppose its more clearly to use it instead of “.size > 0″

]]>